From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from magic.merlins.org ([209.81.13.136]:55201 "EHLO mail1.merlins.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753946Ab3C0V0v (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:26:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:26:50 -0700 From: Marc MERLIN To: Mitch Harder Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: zlib vs lzo uncompress speed, ssd vs nossd Message-ID: <20130327212650.GG17613@merlins.org> References: <20130327165309.GA23559@merlins.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:12:27PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote: > Lzo compression should be faster in every aspect than zlib, especially > for reading. Speaking of which, it would be awesome if there were a some chattr option to choose which encryption you'd like for a file or a subdirectory tree (compress this tree as much as you can, but use fast lzo for that tree). But I agree that would be lower on the priority list, and the chattr interface likely doesn't make that easy. Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/