From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:20292 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754716Ab3C1Afu (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:35:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:35:47 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Rich Johnston , xfs-oss , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request Message-ID: <20130328003547.GX6369@dastard> References: <5152F2BB.4000709@sgi.com> <20130327134606.GJ5861@thunk.org> <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard> <20130327214804.GA28143@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130327214804.GA28143@thunk.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:48:04PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check > > script: > > > > SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" > > Ah, I thought support for named tests was there. For right now, > though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are > considered separate tests, right? Or do we still need to keep the > numbers unique for now? Test numbers within a subdir are unique. So yes, ext4/123 and btrfs/123 are recognised as different tests. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com