Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Matt Pursley <mpursley@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: One random read streaming is fast (~1200MB/s), but two or more are slower (~750MB/s)?
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:58:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418215856.GA2305@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG42Uxccx7NzJN2oyyAqU9mWN8q-6==V2zg1OQ2mOfvBZtbs1w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 07:50:09PM -0600, Matt Pursley wrote:
> Hey All,
> 
> Here are the results of making and reading back a 13GB file on
> "mdraid6 + ext4",  "mdraid6 + btrfs", and "btrfsraid6 + btrfs".
> 
> Seems to show that:
> 1) "mdraid6 + ext4" can do ~1100 MB/s for these sequential reads with
> either one or two files at once.
> 2) "btrfsraid6 + btrfs" can do ~1100 MB/s for sequential reads with
> one file at a time, but only ~750 MB/s with two (or more).
> 3) "mdraid6 + btrfs" can only do ~750 MB/s for these sequential reads
> with either one or two files at once.
> 
> 
> So, seems like the speed drop is related more to the btrfs files
> system, then the experimental raid.
> Although it is interesting that btrfs can only do the full ~1100 MB/s
> with a single file on the btrfsraid6, but not mdraid6.
> 
> 
> Anyway, just some more info and reproducible results.
> 
> I have also opened a ticket in bugzilla.kernel.org for this issue here...
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
>

This is strange, and I can't see any reason why this would happen.  I'll try and
reproduce next week when I'm back from LSF.  Thanks,

Josef 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-16 16:56 One random read streaming is fast (~1200MB/s), but two or more are slower (~750MB/s)? Matt Pursley
2013-04-17  6:55 ` Sander
2013-04-17 17:30   ` Matt Pursley
2013-04-18  1:50     ` Matt Pursley
2013-04-18 21:58       ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-04-25 19:52         ` Matt Pursley
2013-04-25 20:39           ` Josef Bacik
2013-04-25 21:01             ` Matt Pursley
2013-04-25 21:10               ` Josef Bacik
2013-04-26 23:21                 ` Matt Pursley
2013-05-02 18:51                   ` Matt Pursley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130418215856.GA2305@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpursley@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox