From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62745 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796Ab3EETl5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 May 2013 15:41:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 20:41:51 +0100 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: Development discussions related to Fedora Cc: test@lists.fedoraproject.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20130505 changes Message-ID: <20130505194151.GD25815@redhat.com> References: <20130505112617.GA16141@releng03.phx2.fedoraproject.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130505112617.GA16141@releng03.phx2.fedoraproject.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:26:17AM +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > [libguestfs] > 1:libguestfs-1.21.36-1.fc20.i686 requires libbtrfs.so.0 > 1:libguestfs-1.21.36-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libbtrfs.so.0()(64bit) I've started a rebuild of libguestfs which should fix this. Is there any significance to the soname change? Is libbtrfs.so an internal implementation detail or a public API? (I don't have this library on Fedora 18). And if it's a public API will any software need source-level changes to accomodate this bump? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top