linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] btrfs/raid56: fix and cleanup some error paths
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:02:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130722130255.GH5636@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ECF184.9030305@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:47:00PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> On mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:55:15 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The alloc_rbio() frees "raid_map" and "bbio" on error, so there is a
> > potential double free bug in raid56_parity_write().  The
> > raid56_parity_write() and raid56_parity_recover() functions should still
> > free "raid_map" and "bbio" on error if other errors occur though, so I
> > have added some more calls to kfree().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> >From the viewpoint of the readability, it is better to free raid_map and bbio
> in the caller, I think. But it is up to you.

Normally, yes, you are right, but in this case the code makes sense
as is.  We would have to free it in btrfs_map_bio() but we actually
allocate it in __btrfs_map_block().  It would be just as weird as
the current code.

The current code is not ugly, it's just that complicated things
require complicated code.

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-22 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-22  6:55 [patch] btrfs/raid56: fix and cleanup some error paths Dan Carpenter
2013-07-22  8:47 ` Miao Xie
2013-07-22 13:02   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130722130255.GH5636@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).