linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Sandy McArthur <sandymac@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filefrag and btrfs filesystem defragment and maybe snapshots
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:19:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130802021916.GC24158@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPs0BihZNQ1fY4syh-=Pqm_ekVwd7Fw+YhGuVgz0fcO=VUZrFw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:18:50PM -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
> While exploring some btrfs maintenance with respect to defragmenting I
> ran the following commands:
> 
> # filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file
> /path/to/34G.file: 2406 extents found
> /path/to/5.7G.file: 572 extents found
> 
> Thinking those mostly static files could be less fragmented I ran:
> # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/34G.file
> # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/5.7G.file
> 
> and to my surprise the number of fragments/extends doubled:
> 
> # filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file
> /path/to/34G.file: 6324 extents found
> /path/to/5.7G.file: 1079 extents found
> 
> Did I actually improve these files?
> 
> I do have a number rolling readonly snapshots on the subvolume these
> files are on. I can imagine how that might be related but I'm not
> sure. When the pre-defrag snapshots are purged will the filefrag
> extents count drop.

I guess the reason is that you're doing the defragment with compression,
ZLIB in default case, and btrfs compression has a maximum length limit, 128k.
So if the original file's extents have a length larger than 128k, it's possible
to get the results of 'filefrag' doubled.

But I have no possible answer for
'why filefrag extents count drop after purging snapshots'.

-liubo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-02  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-01 21:18 filefrag and btrfs filesystem defragment and maybe snapshots Sandy McArthur
2013-08-02  2:19 ` Liu Bo [this message]
     [not found] <CAPs0BihZNQ1fY4syh-=Pqm_ekVwd7Fw+YhGuVgz0fcO=VUZrFw@mail.gmail. com>
2013-08-02  2:27 ` Duncan
2013-08-02  5:02   ` Sandy McArthur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130802021916.GC24158@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandymac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).