linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: deal with enomem in the rewind path V3
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:11:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130808131130.GB16712@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52034A94.9040003@jan-o-sch.net>

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:36:52AM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, August 07, 2013 at 23:03 (+0200), Josef Bacik wrote:
> > We can get ENOMEM trying to allocate dummy bufs for the rewind operation of the
> > tree mod log.  Instead of BUG_ON()'ing in this case pass up ENOMEM.  I looked
> > back through the callers and I'm pretty sure I got everybody who did BUG_ON(ret)
> > in this path.  Thanks,
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > ---
> > V2->V3:
> > -unlock and free the original buffer on error
> > -return NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM)
> > V1->V2: missed a BUG_ON() for alloc_dummy_extent_buffer.
> > 
> >  fs/btrfs/ctree.c     |   16 +++++-
> >  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > index 0d5c686..1dd8a71 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > @@ -1211,7 +1211,11 @@ tree_mod_log_rewind(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> >  		BUG_ON(tm->slot != 0);
> >  		eb_rewin = alloc_dummy_extent_buffer(eb->start,
> >  						fs_info->tree_root->nodesize);
> > -		BUG_ON(!eb_rewin);
> > +		if (!eb_rewin) {
> > +			btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
> > +			free_extent_buffer(eb);
> > +			return NULL;
> > +		}
> >  		btrfs_set_header_bytenr(eb_rewin, eb->start);
> >  		btrfs_set_header_backref_rev(eb_rewin,
> >  					     btrfs_header_backref_rev(eb));
> > @@ -1219,7 +1223,11 @@ tree_mod_log_rewind(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> >  		btrfs_set_header_level(eb_rewin, btrfs_header_level(eb));
> >  	} else {
> >  		eb_rewin = btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(eb);
> > -		BUG_ON(!eb_rewin);
> > +		if (!eb_rewin) {
> > +			btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
> > +			free_extent_buffer(eb);
> > +			return NULL;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
> > @@ -2772,6 +2780,10 @@ again:
> >  							  BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
> >  			}
> >  			b = tree_mod_log_rewind(root->fs_info, b, time_seq);
> > +			if (!b) {
> > +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +				goto done;
> > +			}
> >  			p->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
> >  			p->nodes[level] = b;
> >  		} else {
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > index deaea9c..b422cba 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > @@ -4222,6 +4222,76 @@ static void __free_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> >  	kmem_cache_free(extent_buffer_cache, eb);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int extent_buffer_under_io(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> > +{
> > +	return (atomic_read(&eb->io_pages) ||
> > +		test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags) ||
> > +		test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Helper for releasing extent buffer page.
> > + */
> > +static void btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page(struct extent_buffer *eb,
> > +						unsigned long start_idx)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long index;
> > +	unsigned long num_pages;
> > +	struct page *page;
> > +	int mapped = !test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &eb->bflags);
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(extent_buffer_under_io(eb));
> > +
> > +	num_pages = num_extent_pages(eb->start, eb->len);
> > +	index = start_idx + num_pages;
> > +	if (start_idx >= index)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		index--;
> > +		page = extent_buffer_page(eb, index);
> > +		if (page && mapped) {
> > +			spin_lock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> > +			/*
> > +			 * We do this since we'll remove the pages after we've
> > +			 * removed the eb from the radix tree, so we could race
> > +			 * and have this page now attached to the new eb.  So
> > +			 * only clear page_private if it's still connected to
> > +			 * this eb.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (PagePrivate(page) &&
> > +			    page->private == (unsigned long)eb) {
> > +				BUG_ON(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> > +				BUG_ON(PageDirty(page));
> > +				BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
> > +				/*
> > +				 * We need to make sure we haven't be attached
> > +				 * to a new eb.
> > +				 */
> > +				ClearPagePrivate(page);
> > +				set_page_private(page, 0);
> > +				/* One for the page private */
> > +				page_cache_release(page);
> > +			}
> > +			spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> > +
> > +		}
> > +		if (page) {
> > +			/* One for when we alloced the page */
> > +			page_cache_release(page);
> > +		}
> > +	} while (index != start_idx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Helper for releasing the extent buffer.
> > + */
> > +static inline void btrfs_release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> > +{
> > +	btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page(eb, 0);
> > +	__free_extent_buffer(eb);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct extent_buffer *__alloc_extent_buffer(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
> >  						   u64 start,
> >  						   unsigned long len,
> > @@ -4276,7 +4346,10 @@ struct extent_buffer *btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *src)
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
> >  		p = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
> > -		BUG_ON(!p);
> > +		if (!p) {
> > +			btrfs_release_extent_buffer(new);
> > +			return NULL;
> > +		}
> >  		attach_extent_buffer_page(new, p);
> >  		WARN_ON(PageDirty(p));
> >  		SetPageUptodate(p);
> > @@ -4317,76 +4390,6 @@ err:
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int extent_buffer_under_io(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> > -{
> > -	return (atomic_read(&eb->io_pages) ||
> > -		test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags) ||
> > -		test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Helper for releasing extent buffer page.
> > - */
> > -static void btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page(struct extent_buffer *eb,
> > -						unsigned long start_idx)
> > -{
> > -	unsigned long index;
> > -	unsigned long num_pages;
> > -	struct page *page;
> > -	int mapped = !test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY, &eb->bflags);
> > -
> > -	BUG_ON(extent_buffer_under_io(eb));
> > -
> > -	num_pages = num_extent_pages(eb->start, eb->len);
> > -	index = start_idx + num_pages;
> > -	if (start_idx >= index)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	do {
> > -		index--;
> > -		page = extent_buffer_page(eb, index);
> > -		if (page && mapped) {
> > -			spin_lock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> > -			/*
> > -			 * We do this since we'll remove the pages after we've
> > -			 * removed the eb from the radix tree, so we could race
> > -			 * and have this page now attached to the new eb.  So
> > -			 * only clear page_private if it's still connected to
> > -			 * this eb.
> > -			 */
> > -			if (PagePrivate(page) &&
> > -			    page->private == (unsigned long)eb) {
> > -				BUG_ON(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> > -				BUG_ON(PageDirty(page));
> > -				BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
> > -				/*
> > -				 * We need to make sure we haven't be attached
> > -				 * to a new eb.
> > -				 */
> > -				ClearPagePrivate(page);
> > -				set_page_private(page, 0);
> > -				/* One for the page private */
> > -				page_cache_release(page);
> > -			}
> > -			spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> > -
> > -		}
> > -		if (page) {
> > -			/* One for when we alloced the page */
> > -			page_cache_release(page);
> > -		}
> > -	} while (index != start_idx);
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Helper for releasing the extent buffer.
> > - */
> > -static inline void btrfs_release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> > -{
> > -	btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page(eb, 0);
> > -	__free_extent_buffer(eb);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void check_buffer_tree_ref(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> >  {
> >  	int refs;
> > 
> 
> Weird patch formatting concerning extent_io.c, I assume there are no changes in
> extent_buffer_under_io and btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page, you just moved
> btrfs_clone_extent_buffer, right? Perhaps --patience or --minimal could do
> better? Otherwise,
> 

Yeah I just moved them up so I could call them, I do hate how it makes the diff
look massive when there's basically no change.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07 21:03 [PATCH] Btrfs: deal with enomem in the rewind path V3 Josef Bacik
2013-08-08  7:36 ` Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08 13:11   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-08-08 14:28   ` David Sterba
2013-08-08 15:01     ` Jan Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130808131130.GB16712@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).