From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dkim1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.53]:49618 "EHLO dkim1.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751143Ab3HTSK4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:10:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.fusionio.com (unknown [10.101.1.160]) by dkim1.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A720E7C069B for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:10:55 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:10:53 -0400 From: Josef Bacik To: Lutz Euler CC: Josef Bacik , Subject: Re: BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1055 during balance. Message-ID: <20130820181053.GG3990@localhost.localdomain> References: <21010.37299.189607.141474@localhost.localdomain> <20130820163840.GF3990@localhost.localdomain> <21011.42147.72271.724888@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <21011.42147.72271.724888@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:17:23PM +0200, Lutz Euler wrote: > Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:44:19PM +0200, Lutz Euler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > during a balance I got the BUG from the subject line, followed by > > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000000008a940. > > This should be fixed in btrfs-next. Thanks, > > Thanks for the info. That is great! > > Unfortunately, I am reluctant to run btrfs-next, but I intend to add an > additional device to this filesystem in the near future and run balance > again then, so could you point me to a commit id in btrfs-next with the > fix? Then I could try to patch 3.6.11-rc6 with that commit or would at > least be able to notice when the fix is going to Linus' tree. > > Thanks again, > Yup it's Btrfs: change how we queue blocks for backref checking Thanks, Josef