From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dkim2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.54]:50124 "EHLO dkim2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753354Ab3IMRAZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:00:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.fusionio.com (unknown [10.101.1.160]) by dkim2.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB709A06B6 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:00:24 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guenter Roeck , Geert Uytterhoeven From: Chris Mason In-Reply-To: <20130913163535.GA5681@roeck-us.net> CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-btrfs , Mark Fasheh , Zach Brown References: <20130913133314.GA20461@roeck-us.net> <20130913163535.GA5681@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <20130913170022.18785.82013@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: Build failures due to commit 416161db (btrfs: offline dedupe) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:00:22 -0400 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Quoting Guenter Roeck (2013-09-13 12:35:35) > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:52:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl_file_extent_same': > > > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2802:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__put_user_unaligned' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > make[2]: *** [fs/btrfs/ioctl.o] Error 1 > > > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > > > > > Seen with alpha:allmodconfig, arm:allmodconfig, m68k:allmodconfig, and > > > xtensa:allmodconfig. > > > > Known issue, cfr. my early warning 10 days ago: > > > > "Btrfs is the first user of __put_user_unaligned() outside the compat code, > > hence now all 32-bit architectures should make sure to implement this, too." > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=137820065929216&w=2 > > > > and today's thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/12/814 > > > > It doesn't seem right that a patch breaks the build for several platforms, and > the problem is then blamed on the platform code instead of the code that is > introducing the problem. > > Maybe we should add BROKEN to the btrfs dependencies for the affected platforms. > After all, it _is_ broken. I'm happy to fix this with a bigger put of the info struct, just let me know the preferred arch-happy solution. -chris