From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dkim2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.54]:51725 "EHLO dkim2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752893Ab3IMTdh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:33:37 -0400 Received: from mx2.fusionio.com (unknown [10.101.1.160]) by dkim2.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F949A06B4 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:33:37 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Fasheh From: Chris Mason In-Reply-To: <20130913175801.GL31381@wotan.suse.de> CC: Guenter Roeck , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-btrfs , Zach Brown References: <20130913133314.GA20461@roeck-us.net> <20130913163535.GA5681@roeck-us.net> <20130913170022.18785.82013@localhost.localdomain> <20130913175801.GL31381@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: <20130913193334.18785.8623@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: Build failures due to commit 416161db (btrfs: offline dedupe) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:33:34 -0400 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Quoting Mark Fasheh (2013-09-13 13:58:01) > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > Quoting Guenter Roeck (2013-09-13 12:35:35) > > I'm happy to fix this with a bigger put of the info struct, just > > let me know the preferred arch-happy solution. > > In fact old versions of the patch were putting the whole struct but during > review I was asked to change it. This should be very straight forward to fix > so long as we all stay calm ;) > --Mark Mark, could you please send a patch for the whole-struct option until the unaligned put is upstreamed? -chris