From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, dsterba@suse.cz,
jbacik@fusionio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add specific test for default ACL inheritance
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:11:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131016161150.GA12895@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381932296-14674-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> This test is motivated by an issue found by a btrfs user, addressed
> and described by the following GNU/Linux kernel patch:
Might be a little too nipicky, but there's no "GNU/Linux" kernel, it's
just Linux.
As for the test: thanks a lot for sending it a long here, but can you
please create a new testcase for the specific inheritance bug instead
of adding it to an existing test case?
> # real QA test starts here
> -_supported_fs xfs udf
> +_supported_fs xfs udf btrfs
Of course enabling the existing tests for btrfs is still fine (although
it should be a second patch)
> -chacl $acl3 largeaclfile
> +if [ "$FSTYP" != "btrfs" ]; then
> + chacl $acl3 largeaclfile
> +else
> + echo 'chacl: cannot set access acl on "largeaclfile": Invalid argument'
> +fi
Does btrfs support unlimited ACLs? If not we should test one above the
limit here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 14:04 [PATCH] xfstests: add specific test for default ACL inheritance Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-10-16 15:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 15:14 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-10-16 15:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 21:51 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 15:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-10-16 16:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 16:11 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-10-16 16:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2013-10-16 16:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-10-16 16:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 21:24 ` Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131016161150.GA12895@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).