From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49834 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751905Ab3JUXVL (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:21:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:21:07 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Filipe David Manana Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: improve inode hash function/inode lookup Message-ID: <20131021232107.GS1032@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <1381092807-21422-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com> <1381094553-2190-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com> <20131011114229.GE5787@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:20:16PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: > Good point David. However it would be a rather radical behaviour change imho. A radical step to prevent this practictly impossible but nasty bug to happen :) > I think it should be a separate change if there are no objections > against such change. It is a separate change that makes your patch obsolete. david