From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, opw-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [OPW kernel] [PATCH 1/3] Bootstrap generic btrfs_find_item interface
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:05:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131102170502.GL15704@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a397119c8d634b82198fe728b9ea3ac4690444c.1383287959.git.kelleynnn@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:53:41PM -0700, Kelley Nielsen wrote:
> There are many btrfs functions that manually search the tree for an
> item. They all reimplement the same mechanism and differ in the
> conditions that they use to find the item.__inode_info() is one such
You need a space after the '.' here; otherwise, this looks like a call
to "item.__inode_info()".
> example. It has been proposed that a new interface be created to
> take the place of these functions.
Same suggestion as in the cover letter: "It has been proposed that a new
interface be created" -> "Zach Brown proposed creating a new interface"
> This patch is the first step to creating the interface. A new function,
> btrfs_find_item, has been added to ctree.c and prototyped in ctree.h.
> It is identical to __inode_info, except that the order of the parameters
> has been rearranged to more closely those of similar functions elsewhere
> in the code (now, root and path come first, then the objectid, offset
> and type, and the key to be filled in last). __inode_info's callers have
> been set to call this new function instead, and __inode_info itself has
> been removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
With the fix above,
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/backref.c | 40 ++++------------------------------------
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> index 3775947..595bd1f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> @@ -1107,38 +1107,6 @@ int btrfs_find_all_roots(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -
> -static int __inode_info(u64 inum, u64 ioff, u8 key_type,
> - struct btrfs_root *fs_root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> - struct btrfs_key *found_key)
> -{
> - int ret;
> - struct btrfs_key key;
> - struct extent_buffer *eb;
> -
> - key.type = key_type;
> - key.objectid = inum;
> - key.offset = ioff;
> -
> - ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, fs_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - eb = path->nodes[0];
> - if (ret && path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
> - ret = btrfs_next_leaf(fs_root, path);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - eb = path->nodes[0];
> - }
> -
> - btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, found_key, path->slots[0]);
> - if (found_key->type != key.type || found_key->objectid != key.objectid)
> - return 1;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * this makes the path point to (inum INODE_ITEM ioff)
> */
> @@ -1146,16 +1114,16 @@ int inode_item_info(u64 inum, u64 ioff, struct btrfs_root *fs_root,
> struct btrfs_path *path)
> {
> struct btrfs_key key;
> - return __inode_info(inum, ioff, BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY, fs_root, path,
> - &key);
> + return btrfs_find_item(fs_root, path, inum, ioff,
> + BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY, &key);
> }
>
> static int inode_ref_info(u64 inum, u64 ioff, struct btrfs_root *fs_root,
> struct btrfs_path *path,
> struct btrfs_key *found_key)
> {
> - return __inode_info(inum, ioff, BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY, fs_root, path,
> - found_key);
> + return btrfs_find_item(fs_root, path, inum, ioff,
> + BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY, found_key);
> }
>
> int btrfs_find_one_extref(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 inode_objectid,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index 316136b..3828352 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -2462,6 +2462,43 @@ static int key_search(struct extent_buffer *b, struct btrfs_key *key,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Proposed generic search function, meant to take the place of the
> +* various small search helper functions throughout the code and standardize
> +* the search interface. Right now, it only replaces the former __inode_info
> +* in backref.c.
> +*/
Very nice work; even your comments are bisectable. :)
> +int btrfs_find_item(struct btrfs_root *fs_root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> + u64 inum, u64 ioff, u8 key_type,
> + struct btrfs_key *found_key)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct btrfs_key key;
> + struct extent_buffer *eb;
> +
> + key.type = key_type;
> + key.objectid = inum;
> + key.offset = ioff;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, fs_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + eb = path->nodes[0];
> + if (ret && path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
> + ret = btrfs_next_leaf(fs_root, path);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + eb = path->nodes[0];
> + }
> +
> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, found_key, path->slots[0]);
> + if (found_key->type != key.type ||
> + found_key->objectid != key.objectid)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * look for key in the tree. path is filled in with nodes along the way
> * if key is found, we return zero and you can find the item in the leaf
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 941019d..aa9993c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -3357,6 +3357,8 @@ int btrfs_duplicate_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_root *root,
> struct btrfs_path *path,
> struct btrfs_key *new_key);
> +int btrfs_find_item(struct btrfs_root *fs_root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> + u64 inum, u64 ioff, u8 key_type, struct btrfs_key *found_key);
> int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
> *root, struct btrfs_key *key, struct btrfs_path *p, int
> ins_len, int cow);
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opw-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opw-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-02 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-01 6:52 [PATCH 0/3] bootstrapping btrfs_find_item_interface Kelley Nielsen
2013-11-01 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] Bootstrap generic btrfs_find_item interface Kelley Nielsen
2013-11-02 17:05 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2013-11-02 17:02 ` [OPW kernel] [PATCH 0/3] bootstrapping btrfs_find_item_interface Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131102170502.GL15704@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kelleynnn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opw-kernel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).