From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:47525 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754086Ab3KGNpw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:45:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:45:25 +0800 From: Liu Bo To: dsterba@suse.cz, Stefan Behrens Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Btrfs: change ioctl number of BTRFS_IOC_START_SYNC to 21 Message-ID: <20131107134524.GA9760@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com References: <1383728479-29037-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> <527A0F0B.7020009@giantdisaster.de> <20131106132425.GV16662@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20131106132425.GV16662@twin.jikos.cz> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:24:25PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:42:35AM +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote: > > Sharing the ioctl value seems to have happened by mistake and is > > uncommon, but IMHO now it's too late to change this interface just for > > esthetical reasons. > > Agreed, it's part of ABI, ioctl.h is "append only". Ok, I think that's why I tagged it as 'RFC' :-) -liubo