From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34880 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755190AbaAVMoA (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:44:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:43:58 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Wang Shilong Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Miao Xie , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion Message-ID: <20140122124358.GI6498@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <1389086721-19624-1-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1389086721-19624-2-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140113182745.GS6498@twin.jikos.cz> <52D49F80.6020604@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140115164038.GD6498@twin.jikos.cz> <52D744C6.7040006@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140121181626.GC6498@twin.jikos.cz> <52DF84DE.6080904@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <52DF84DE.6080904@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:44:14PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > >So we disagree, I see a reason for the deletion protection and will do > >the patch myself. Let's see if we can get more user feedback then. > > > >I'm NAKing this patch in current state, if it helps anything. > Both ways are ok for me actually, don't be annoyed anyway, Nah, this is a message to maintainers that the patch discussion has reached some conclusion and should help deciding if the patch should be merged or not. We've seen in the past that after a moderate discussion against patch inclusion, the patch ended up merged as if nothing happend. _This_ can be annoying. > You and Miao are really doing a good job to Btrfs, just go ahead, i > am ok with dropping this patch.^_^ Ok, thanks.