From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, jbacik@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: more tests for test case btrfs/030
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 08:57:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140202215720.GT2212@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391220332-22118-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 02:05:32AM +0000, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> This change adds some new tests for btrfs' incremental send feature.
> These are all related with inverting the parent-child relationship
> of directories, and cover the cases:
>
> * when the new parent didn't get renamed (just moved)
> * when a child file of the former parent gets renamed too
>
> These new cases are fixed by the following btrfs linux kernel patches:
>
> * "Btrfs: more send support for parent/child dir relationship inversion"
> * "Btrfs: fix send dealing with file renames and directory moves"
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Rather than modifying 030 which will cause it to fail on kernels
where it previously passed, can you factor out the common code and
create a new test with the additional coverage?
i.e. the rule of thumb is that once a test is "done" we don't go
back and modify it in significant ways - we write a new unit test
that covers the new/extended functionality. Redundancy in unit tests
is not a bad thing...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-02 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-01 2:05 [PATCH] xfstests: more tests for test case btrfs/030 Filipe David Borba Manana
2014-02-02 21:57 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-02-02 22:08 ` Filipe David Manana
2014-02-02 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140202215720.GT2212@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).