From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:39:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210213944.GT13647@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392034256-2412-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:10:56PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> So i was wandering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong
> kernel patch while it defenitely should not.
>
> By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not
> filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so
> it came out we will never fail this test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/004 | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> mode change 100755 => 100644 tests/btrfs/004
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/004 b/tests/btrfs/004
> old mode 100755
> new mode 100644
> index 14da9f1..17a6e34
> --- a/tests/btrfs/004
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/004
> @@ -57,10 +57,9 @@ _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
>
> rm -f $seqres.full
>
> -FILEFRAG_FILTER='if (/, blocksize (\d+)/) {$blocksize = $1; next} ($ext, '\
> -'$logical, $physical, $expected, $length, $flags) = (/^\s*(\d+)\s+(\d+)'\
> -'\s+(\d+)\s+(?:(\d+)\s+)?(\d+)\s+(.*)/) or next; $flags =~ '\
> -'/(?:^|,)inline(?:,|$)/ and next; print $physical * $blocksize, "#", '\
> +FILEFRAG_FILTER='if (/blocks of (\d+) bytes/) {$blocksize = $1; next} ($ext, '\
> +'$logical, $physical, $length) = (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:'\
> +'\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/) or next; print $physical * $blocksize, "#", '\
> '$length * $blocksize, "#", $logical * $blocksize, " "'
Oh, boy, who allowed that mess to pass review? Please format this in
a readable manner while you are changing it.
FILEFRAG_FILTER='
if (/blocks of (\d+) bytes/) { \
$blocksize = $1; \
next; \
}
.....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 12:10 [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work Wang Shilong
2014-02-10 19:18 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-11 1:22 ` Wang Shilong
2014-02-11 2:01 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 21:39 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-02-11 1:24 ` Wang Shilong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140210213944.GT13647@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
--cc=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).