From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from luka.romanrm.net ([213.163.64.74]:40557 "EHLO luka.romanrm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751517AbaBMVAs (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:00:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:00:45 +0600 From: Roman Mamedov To: kreijack@inwind.it Cc: kreijack@libero.it, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Message-ID: <20140214030045.415e21da@natsu> In-Reply-To: <52FD21B4.4050502@libero.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/BpMJ2jnhZM=+Lt0C6Sj//Zo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: References: <52FD1AD6.50500@libero.it> <20140214012810.26297146@natsu> <52FD21B4.4050502@libero.it> --Sig_/BpMJ2jnhZM=+Lt0C6Sj//Zo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100 Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are r= ight=20 > when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usag= e" ? Personally I don't see the point of being super-pedantic here, i.e. "look t= his is not just filesystem usage, this is filesystem CHUNK usage"... Consistency of having a matching "dev usage" and "fi usage" would have been nicer. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/BpMJ2jnhZM=+Lt0C6Sj//Zo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlL9Mn0ACgkQTLKSvz+PZwjSkwCfVkoIz64y+J4EZ7zgHSPrPZ+2 CJUAoIkAeosqRPv61auTuy/BkaDkJuS6 =nDod -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BpMJ2jnhZM=+Lt0C6Sj//Zo--