linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: don't remove BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP in chunk type
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:44:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140220144428.GA31816@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

During restoring of image (-r using btrfs-image) we zero out RAID
profile in chunk type but forget to save BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP if
present. This results in some false messages being printed by btrfsck.

$  ./mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb2 -f
$  ./btrfs-image /dev/sdb2 btrfs_image_output
$  ./btrfs-image -r btrfs_image_output disk-image
$  ./btrfsck disk-image
Checking filesystem on disk-image
UUID: e644be2d-7701-4bd4-8804-7487f560d2a7
checking extents
Chunk[256, 228, 20971520]: length(8388608), offset(20971520), type(2) mismatch with block group[20971520, 192, 8388608]: offset(8388608), objectid(20971520), flags(34)
Chunk[256, 228, 29360128]: length(1073741824), offset(29360128), type(4) mismatch with block group[29360128, 192, 1073741824]: offset(1073741824), objectid(29360128), flags(36)
Block group[20971520, 8388608] (flags = 34) didn't find the relative chunk.
Block group[29360128, 1073741824] (flags = 36) didn't find the relative chunk.

Even though ./btrfsck on /dev/sdb2 seemed fine. This is due to type
mismatch above and type mismatch occured because we zero'ed out
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP while handling chunk trees.

Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com>
---
 btrfs-image.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c
index 7bcfc06..2be54a7 100644
--- a/btrfs-image.c
+++ b/btrfs-image.c
@@ -1521,7 +1521,8 @@ static int fixup_chunk_tree_block(struct mdrestore_struct *mdres,
 			type = btrfs_stack_chunk_type(&chunk);
 			type &= (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA |
 				 BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM |
-				 BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA);
+				 BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA |
+				 BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP);
 			btrfs_set_stack_chunk_type(&chunk, type);
 
 			btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(&chunk, 1);
-- 
1.8.3.1


                 reply	other threads:[~2014-02-20 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140220144428.GA31816@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rakesh@tuxera.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).