From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from frost.carfax.org.uk ([85.119.82.111]:33325 "EHLO frost.carfax.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbaCWWwd (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:52:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 22:52:29 +0000 From: Hugo Mills To: Marc MERLIN Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Any use for mkfs.btrfs -d raid5 -m raid1 ? Message-ID: <20140323225229.GJ25400@carfax.org.uk> References: <20140323224435.GC18293@merlins.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LG0Ll82vYr46+VA1" In-Reply-To: <20140323224435.GC18293@merlins.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --LG0Ll82vYr46+VA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:44:35PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > If I lose 2 drives on a raid5, -m raid1 should ensure I haven't lost my > metadate. > From there, would I indeed have small files that would be stored entirely= on > some of the drives that didn't go missing, and therefore I could recover > some data with 2 missing drives? btrfs's RAID-1 is two copies only, so you may well have lost some of your metadata. n-copies RAID-1 is coming Real Soon Now=E2=84=A2 (Chris h= as it on his todo list, along with fixing all the parity RAID stuff). > Or is it kind of pointless/waste of space? >=20 > Actually, would it make btrfs faster for metadata work since it can read > from n drives in parallel and get data just a bit faster, or is that most= ly > negligeable? I don't think we've got good benchmarks from anyone on any of this kind of thing. Hugo. --=20 =3D=3D=3D Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk= =3D=3D=3D PGP key: 65E74AC0 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Great oxymorons of the world, no. 9: Standard Deviation --- =20 --LG0Ll82vYr46+VA1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUBUy9lrVheFHXiqx3kAQJ01w//YBPCXeOwG9GyXczM5fceBJ3f6ghZ7Bce 1zIFaSoGrQ0jguRrfaUV9OoK3efgidUaJXEox7Xjp9AlfqOabrwiuq/LY8OY/zR7 jOz7Go5HkOBS+nI9YBjSvlh8ZXtC3SgKn9THlXxD5bAOrVRwOFg3HkASl+EgBU4g IGiyKc88faz3MB9y2SQ2KStGpkBFpKY6zcQpMkMWnviT0FMZtpOa5L/q8HNBwM3T 33/NDYV984xkxOD4S0pdIUjxua67fg/BsJ1pnjhL7gr966SstmjY2LSIAtzQDzZM TOytowNThM77QK+23KAPcX1CBd5xQSI2RZSxzKqUmOF19vSTDvbV9Reiw4PNd3lv P6+ww3CXs2+ZYwii+zaDXo9l5q5yFeKHHx7eQEq0eUBE2J/ovcL1+MFEBYIJZSg6 eOb/ZQXxVvQx8jQaS38s1msBuDGLDH8tg+rn/gvkyn37H7wIiRbcg4JYQfasi7Rc SmlNBoCWX5fmpHXQZDC0Iz4CrjZN89ygGS1auJzyxXRIWvn4h+poHpd3lL74aGEJ yX02bIjmKZLHqfPTQaArGm9yFG1cFbTRISt8TwHXzbnRcdVW3QexnIFM5Dm6BOdU tsPqF/y061peQ22W4oKnmi8fPwFnkS4nsYCM7YKqtL+Z+HQwgRKiAdju+tN8sY67 bm2MhTFBmwU= =6SDC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LG0Ll82vYr46+VA1--