From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:19976 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754466AbaDNRIs (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:08:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:08:31 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: dsterba@suse.cz, Chris Mason , harald@redhat.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, christophjaeger@linux.com Subject: Re: btrfs: allow mounting btrfs subvolumes with different ro/rw options Message-ID: <20140414170831.GU4963@mwanda> References: <20140414131010.GA12764@mwanda> <534BE4F6.9050300@fb.com> <20140414161705.GN29256@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140414161705.GN29256@twin.jikos.cz> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:17:05PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:39:02AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > > > > On 04/14/2014 09:10 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > >Hello Harald Hoyer, > > > > > >The patch 0723a0473fb4: "btrfs: allow mounting btrfs subvolumes with > > >different ro/rw options" from Nov 19, 2013, leads to the following > > >static checker warning: > > > > I'll fix this one up. Harald's email has changed and I should have pulled > > the patch in long ago. > > There are now 2 reports for that and 1 patch, > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3972911/ It was different static checkers though. Duplicate warnings are unavoidable in this situation. regards, dan carpenter