From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:35629 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755467AbaDPL1B (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:27:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:27:00 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Filipe David Manana Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chandan Rajendra , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , linuxpatches@star.c10r.facebook.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: implement inode_operations callback tmpfile Message-ID: <20140416112700.GA1187@infradead.org> References: <1396392799-9858-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com> <1468801.p0fTO3mgjp@localhost.localdomain> <20140416110916.GA10386@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:25:07PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: > Interesting Christoph. > I was following the ext4 implementation initially. > > So it seems the question is still open, and none of the following > alternatives is decided yet (unless I missed something in the thread > at fsdevel): > > 1) inherit acl from directory passed to the tmpfile handler; > 2) inherit acl at link time from directory we're linking to; > 3) don't inherit acls > > Thanks for the heads up. I'll make sure we'll have a testcase in xfstests to cover whatever behavior we decide on to make sure all filesystems behave the same way.