From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de ([89.1.8.212]:46916 "EHLO cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbaDZSSc (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:18:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 20:18:27 +0200 From: Stefan Malte Schumacher To: Hugo Mills , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df Message-ID: <20140426181827.GA14687@mars> References: <20140426140915.GA12958@mars> <20140426143023.GK2391@carfax.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140426143023.GK2391@carfax.org.uk> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. > They'll go away if you balance them: > > btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single /mountpoint btrfs refused this command, I had to pass --force to execute it. It exited with this:Done, had to relocate 2 out of 2710 chunks. After that btrfs fi df shows the following: Data, RAID1: total=2.64TiB, used=2.22TiB System, RAID1: total=8.00MiB, used=380.00KiB >System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00< Metadata, RAID1: total=4.00GiB, used=2.94GiB > btrfs fi label should do this. I was mainly asking because of this: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/UseCases: You can also use btrfs command.There are currently few limitations: the filesystem has to be unmounted the filesystem should not have more than one device Is this information outdated? > You might want to look at upgrading to 3.13 or 3.14 kernel, which > has 6 months or so extra bug fixes in it. Thanks, going to have a look if openSUSE has anything more recent in their repositories. Bye Stefan