From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:38728 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751662AbaEPIxW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 16 May 2014 04:53:22 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 01:53:20 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Luk?? Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests: new mailing list
Message-ID: <20140516085320.GA29279@infradead.org>
References: <20140516044611.GA8206@dastard>
 <20140516054009.GA17647@infradead.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405161047010.2099@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405161047010.2099@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:48:42AM +0200, Luk?? Czerner wrote:
> > > As requested I've created a new mailing list for xfstests
> > > development and discussion. Reflecting the fact that the test
> > > harness is not really XFS specific anymore, the list is:
> > > 
> > > 	fstests@vger.kernel.org
> > 
> > Isn't there an "x" missing somewhere?
> 
> It's intentional and it is "Reflecting the fact that the test
> harness is not really XFS specific anymore", even though the test
> suite itself keep the name xfstests.
> 
> This way it's more obvious to people that this is in fact not xfs
> specific.

Having the name different from the project it is for is stupid.  Either
rename the test suite, or use the same name for the mailing list.