From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53768 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541AbaFFKDG (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:03:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:03:02 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Gui Hecheng Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [PATCH] mount: add btrfs to mount.8 Message-ID: <20140606100302.GB30975@x2.net.home> References: <1401933919-23608-1-git-send-email-guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140605080311.GW9000@x2.net.home> <1402036359.17740.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20140606094428.GA30975@x2.net.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140606094428.GA30975@x2.net.home> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:44:28AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > I personally have no problem to maintain information about arbitrary > FS in mount.8, the problem are updates. Unfortunately, kernel FS developers > don't care about the man page at all and it's very often not up to date. Hmm.. another possible way would be to create a script for util-linux that will analyze kernel Documentation/filesystems/.txt and report changes that is necessary to make to mount.8. It should be relative simple with git. I'll try it.. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com