From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tango.0pointer.de ([85.214.72.216]:51247 "EHLO tango.0pointer.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbaFOWni (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:43:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:43:34 +0200 From: Lennart Poettering To: Kai Krakow Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS Message-ID: <20140615224334.GH24386@tango.0pointer.de> References: <1346098950.2730051402571606829.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> <20140612232453.GR9508@dastard> <539B78F3.9070607@libero.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 14.06.14 12:59, Kai Krakow (hurikhan77@gmail.com) wrote: > > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> schrieb: > > > As they say, "Whoosh!" > > > > At least here, I interpreted that remark as primarily sarcastic > > commentary on the systemd devs' apparent attitude, which can be > > (controversially) summarized as: "Systemd doesn't have problems because > > it's perfect. Therefore, any problems you have with systemd must instead > > be with other components which systemd depends on." > > Come on, sorry, but this is fud. Really... ;-) Interestingly, I never commented on anything in this area, and neither did anybody else from the systemd side afaics. THe entire btrfs defrag thing i wasn't aware of before this thread started on the system ML a few days ago. I am not sure where you take your ideas about our "attitude" from. God, with behaviour like that you just make us ignore you, Duncan. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat