From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:50560 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752987AbaGVHha (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 03:37:30 -0400 Received: from marcec ([77.22.138.176]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJSuF-1X71vf3xc3-0038jf for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:37:29 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:37:19 +0200 From: Marc Joliet To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ENOSPC errors during balance Message-ID: <20140722093719.51e8ab93@marcec> In-Reply-To: References: <20140719172605.445e8445@marcec> <39E33553-3073-483E-9A2A-088212B40D0B@colorremedies.com> <20140720122233.4ef06751@marcec> <20140720134054.3cd6cef3@marcec> <20140720214440.398e7e68@marcec> <20140721152216.27d8a4c4@marcec> <20140722003057.0f3b89f0@marcec> <20140722013022.52b189ee@marcec> Reply-To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_//WJ46l/3iz8/p6a/2U=sHnn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Sig_//WJ46l/3iz8/p6a/2U=sHnn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Tue, 22 Jul 2014 03:26:39 +0000 (UTC) schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>: > Marc Joliet posted on Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:30:22 +0200 as excerpted: >=20 > > And now that the background deletion of the old snapshots is done, the = file > > system ended up at: > >=20 > > # btrfs filesystem df /run/media/marcec/MARCEC_BACKUP =20 > > Data, single: total=3D219.00GiB, used=3D140.13GiB > > System, DUP: total=3D32.00MiB, used=3D36.00KiB > > Metadata, DUP: total=3D4.50GiB, used=3D2.40GiB > > unknown, single: total=3D512.00MiB, used=3D0.00 > >=20 > > I don't know how reliable du is for this, but I used it to estimate how= much > > used data I should expect, and I get 138 GiB. That means that the snap= shots > > yield about 2 GiB "overhead", which is very reasonable, I think. Obvio= usly > > I'll be starting a full balance now. >=20 [snip total/used discussion] No, you misunderstand: read my email three steps above yours (from the 21. = at 15:22). I am wondering about why the disk usage ballooned to >200 GiB in t= he first place. --=20 Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup --Sig_//WJ46l/3iz8/p6a/2U=sHnn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTzhS3AAoJEL/Q5oYsiHj0YGQP/je0K8nfNKlWH9wSssksFw6q 2Oqg6EPeGNzOcH+lFLIBecF1R3rmkZPuQv7D8aNbdDLzltDgzpF7QbgazpQqTlwH HYnPkg8silmgCWbA1wuPrYZtuw/gW6oOU7xiDFSq1/PVi61OqKjT46UqhH1WZjbB VTKQznr0cjT189htS+EfJmIBIrWIPAgTwi/FmPjHTx4FQ3g5wW9niZxQSq/xQWXR 5bw8h5P9STxe/j+n3C15AZ/cyBwPLWk+V0GGiO5dkNCfxbSSwlykd5rWMo/tgxHW 1CAcdMDTvjZidkE41NzjwIPTCDlCflMkRR4Mc0M6ZfXMk3aP1TxUfTFGhINn6S/+ yJbzQ5yv9wy2pQ11FxoTZ657YY0hrRQjLvnZFCLW0adeRQ1DGjFbrgzFvbvPvcbM kVoAiGwtpGGWPgFNrRhQ2fdW3Uf1eQbHRvjqkKGlCc9yQP3+rCMAXIFnOKgbGolW 0aPxCxwnXf2YtN4Gig09e5W0m8utuD94/UuocDRQeGK3txyqvB2v474l98CYBf5k SVy6T0oovo+4ob93H5cy1fnoMqprXBFkXETi26crI8fHqulZ85kMkrFvBP2vmw3B 3jk1Z9deejEomKDwQw1kiQVBRDnPOCXqOIR6taajRYPX4BkneHRNU2tKFF28FCV0 g1XBypYqOMOL8JDPNXxw =f7iW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//WJ46l/3iz8/p6a/2U=sHnn--