From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:26872 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753190AbaHLC4v (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:56:51 -0400 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s7C2uobH025598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:56:50 GMT Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7C2unVj012388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:56:49 GMT Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7C2umxB013054 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:56:48 GMT Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:56:42 +0800 From: Liu Bo To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Blocked tasks on 3.15.1 Message-ID: <20140812025641.GA9244@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com References: <52e3cfababa49919100759860b59aa7c@admin.virtall.com> <53C7CD0F.7070603@fb.com> <1745216.hDa4tC2HJJ@merkaba> <53CE7ACF.7070109@fb.com> <20140812025521.GA6730@pyropus.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140812025521.GA6730@pyropus.ca> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:55:21PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > The blocked tasks issue that got significantly worse in 3.15 -- did anything > go into 3.16 related to this? I didn't see a single "btrfs" in Linus' 3.16 > announcement, so I don't know whether it should be better, the same, or worse > in this respect... > > I haven't seen a definite statement about this on this list, either. > > Can someone more familiar with the state of development comment on this? Good news is that we've figured out the bug and the patch is already under testing :-) thanks, -liubo