From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:33404 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752449AbaHSDcY (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:32:24 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so9055847pad.22 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([203.114.244.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pr5sm17631304pbb.53.2014.08.18.20.32.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:32:16 +0800 From: Eryu Guan To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BUG] cannot mount subvolume with selinux context Message-ID: <20140819033216.GB3013@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Description of the problem: mount btrfs with selinux context, then create a subvolume, the new subvolume cannot be mounted, even with the same context. mkfs -t btrfs /dev/sda5 mount -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sda5 /mnt/btrfs btrfs subvolume create /mnt/btrfs/subvol mount -o subvol=subvol,context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sda5 /mnt/test The last mount fails, and dmesg shows: SELinux: mount invalid. Same superblock, different security settings for (dev sda5, type btrfs) But in fact, the security settings are the same. from fs/super.c struct dentry * mount_fs(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, const char *name, void *data) { struct dentry *root; struct super_block *sb; char *secdata = NULL; int error = -ENOMEM; if (data && !(type->fs_flags & FS_BINARY_MOUNTDATA)) { secdata = alloc_secdata(); if (!secdata) goto out; error = security_sb_copy_data(data, secdata); if (error) goto out_free_secdata; } root = type->mount(type, flags, name, data); The security_sb_copy_data() takes out selinux context data to "secdata", then mount_subvol() calls mount_fs() (via vfs_kern_mount()) again without selinux context, so mount_subvol() fails, which fails the whole mount. Not sure what's the proper fix. Zach suggestted that the fix will probably be to rework the vfs functions a bit as he said in rh bugzilla[1]. Thanks, Eryu [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130860