From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole.
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:34:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827103412.GA24545@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H5R_nemONu2T2Fzwb7hCVEz7S+Zv0ctSfvRwe3LBHP11Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:41:14AM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:16:10PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >> btrfs_punch_hole() will truncate unaligned pages or punch hole on a
> >> already existed hole.
> >> This will cause unneeded zero page or holes splitting the original huge
> >> hole.
> >>
> >> This patch will skip already existed holes before any page truncating or
> >> hole punching.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/btrfs/file.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> >> index ae6af07..93915d1 100644
> >> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> >> @@ -2168,6 +2168,37 @@ out:
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * Find a hole extent on given inode and change start/len to the end of hole
> >> + * extent.(hole/vacuum extent whose em->start <= start &&
> >> + * em->start + em->len > start)
> >> + * When a hole extent is found, return 1 and modify start/len.
> >> + */
> >> +static int find_first_non_hole(struct inode *inode, u64 *start, u64 *len)
> >> +{
> >> + struct extent_map *em;
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, *start, *len, 0);
> >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(em)) {
> >> + if (!em)
> >> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> + else
> >> + ret = PTR_ERR(em);
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* Hole or vacuum extent(only exists in no-hole mode) */
> >> + if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE) {
> >> + ret = 1;
> >> + *len = em->start + em->len > *start + *len ?
> >> + 0 : *start + *len - em->start - em->len;
> >> + *start = em->start + em->len;
> >> + }
> >> + free_extent_map(em);
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> {
> >> struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
> >> @@ -2175,17 +2206,18 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> struct btrfs_path *path;
> >> struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv;
> >> struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> >> - u64 lockstart = round_up(offset, BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize);
> >> - u64 lockend = round_down(offset + len,
> >> - BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize) - 1;
> >> - u64 cur_offset = lockstart;
> >> + u64 lockstart;
> >> + u64 lockend;
> >> + u64 tail_start;
> >> + u64 tail_len;
> >> + u64 orig_start = offset;
> >> + u64 cur_offset;
> >> u64 min_size = btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(root, 1);
> >> u64 drop_end;
> >> int ret = 0;
> >> int err = 0;
> >> int rsv_count;
> >> - bool same_page = ((offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) ==
> >> - ((offset + len - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT));
> >> + bool same_page;
> >> bool no_holes = btrfs_fs_incompat(root->fs_info, NO_HOLES);
> >> u64 ino_size = round_up(inode->i_size, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> >>
> >> @@ -2194,6 +2226,21 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &offset, &len);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + if (ret && !len) {
> >> + /* Already in a large hole */
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + lockstart = round_up(offset , BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize);
> >> + lockend = round_down(offset + len,
> >> + BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize) - 1;
> >
> > Why do we round_up lockstart but round_down lockend?
> >
> > For [0,4095], then lockstart is 4096 and lockend is (u64)-1, any thoughts?
>
> Seems odd, but is it a problem for that case?
> The same_page check below makes us return without locking the range in
> the iotree using the computed values for lockstart and lockend.
No problems so far luckily, but it's odd.
thanks,
-liubo
>
> >
> > thanks,
> > -liubo
> >
> >> + same_page = ((offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) ==
> >> + ((offset + len - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT));
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * We needn't truncate any page which is beyond the end of the file
> >> * because we are sure there is no data there.
> >> @@ -2205,8 +2252,7 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> if (same_page && len < PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> >> if (offset < ino_size)
> >> ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode, offset, len, 0);
> >> - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> - return ret;
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* zero back part of the first page */
> >> @@ -2218,12 +2264,39 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - /* zero the front end of the last page */
> >> - if (offset + len < ino_size) {
> >> - ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode, offset + len, 0, 1);
> >> - if (ret) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> - return ret;
> >> + /* Check the aligned pages after the first unaligned page,
> >> + * if offset != orig_start, which means the first unaligned page
> >> + * including serveral following pages are already in holes,
> >> + * the extra check can be skipped */
> >> + if (offset == orig_start) {
> >> + /* after truncate page, check hole again */
> >> + len = offset + len - lockstart;
> >> + offset = lockstart;
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &offset, &len);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + if (ret && !len) {
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + }
> >> + lockstart = offset;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* Check the tail unaligned part is in a hole */
> >> + tail_start = lockend + 1;
> >> + tail_len = offset + len - tail_start;
> >> + if (tail_len) {
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &tail_start, &tail_len);
> >> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + if (!ret) {
> >> + /* zero the front end of the last page */
> >> + if (tail_start + tail_len < ino_size) {
> >> + ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode,
> >> + tail_start + tail_len, 0, 1);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -2299,6 +2372,8 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> BUG_ON(ret);
> >> trans->block_rsv = rsv;
> >>
> >> + cur_offset = lockstart;
> >> + len = lockend - cur_offset;
> >> while (cur_offset < lockend) {
> >> ret = __btrfs_drop_extents(trans, root, inode, path,
> >> cur_offset, lockend + 1,
> >> @@ -2339,6 +2414,14 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> rsv, min_size);
> >> BUG_ON(ret); /* shouldn't happen */
> >> trans->block_rsv = rsv;
> >> +
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &cur_offset, &len);
> >> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> >> + break;
> >> + if (ret && !len) {
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (ret) {
> >> @@ -2372,6 +2455,7 @@ out_free:
> >> out:
> >> unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart, lockend,
> >> &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> >> +out_only_mutex:
> >> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> if (ret && !err)
> >> err = ret;
> >> --
> >> 1.9.3
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-30 7:16 [PATCH] btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole Qu Wenruo
2014-08-06 18:58 ` Filipe David Manana
2014-08-07 0:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-08-27 8:19 ` Liu Bo
2014-08-27 8:41 ` Filipe David Manana
2014-08-27 10:34 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2014-09-01 1:06 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140827103412.GA24545@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).