From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58394 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752719AbaLAJeB (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:34:01 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvNMl-0002ok-OG for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:33:59 +0100 Received: from 94.250.180.197 ([94.250.180.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:33:59 +0100 Received: from gour by 94.250.180.197 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:33:59 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Gour Subject: Re: pro/cons of raid1 with mdadm/lvm2 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:33:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20141201103346.5ced6500@atmarama> References: <20141130121147.45884217@atmarama> <20141201104236.1506b0a9@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:42:36 +0500 Roman Mamedov wrote: > Pros: [...] > Con: > > * You only get the ability to recover from a checksum failure with > Btrfs RAID1, not with mdadm RAID1 (see Russell's reply). For the reasons you mentioned I'll keep my root under btrfs' native raid and do some more thinking in regard to /home and possibility to use XFS for it. Sincerely, Gour -- Abandoning all attachment to the results of his activities, ever satisfied and independent, he performs no fruitive action, although engaged in all kinds of undertakings.