From: Ian Armstrong <btrfs@iarmst.co.uk>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs stuck with lot's of files
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:56:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202185613.72992959@spike.private.network> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$9649c$5bf442fc$686ccac2$96f1d79b@cox.net>
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:48:21 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:50:29 +0300 as excerpted:
>
> > В Пн, 01/12/2014 в 10:47 -0800, Robert White пишет:
> >> On 12/01/2014 03:46 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
> >> > (stuff about getting hung up trying to write to one drive)
> >>
> >> That drive (/dev/sdn) is probably starting to fail.
> >> (about failed drive)
> >
> > Thank you Robert for the answer. It is not likely that drive fails
> > here. Similar condition (write to a single drive) happens with
> > other drives i.e. such write pattern may happen with any drive.
> >
> > After looking at what happens longer I see the following. During
> > stuck single processor core is busy 100% of CPU in kernel space
> > (some kworker is taking 100% CPU).
>
> FWIW, agreed that it's unlikely to be the drive, especially if you're
> not seeing bus resets or drive errors in dmesg and smart says the
> drive is fine, as I expect it does/will. It may be a btrfs bug or
> scaling issue, of which btrfs still has some, or it could simply be
> the single mode vs raid0 mode issue I explain below.
I encountered a similar problem here a few days ago on a btrfs raid1
partition while using rsync to clone a (~30GB) directory.
Everything started fine, but I came back an hour later to find rsync had
apparently stalled at about 20% with cpu usage at 100% on a single
kworker thread. I was able to kill rsync eventually, and after a while
(don't know how long, but >10 minutes) cpu usage returned to normal.
Restarting rsync resulted in kworker at 100% cpu in less than a minute.
Once stalled there was little drive access happening. Another raid1
partition (mdadm/ext4) on the same drive pair was having no problems.
Nothing showed in the system logs.
In this instance I'd forgotten to delete a temporary 500GB file before
starting rsync, so although recently balanced (musage=80/dusage=80) it
was running at near capacity.
After a reboot, deleting the 500GB file & running balance, everything
returned to normal. Ran rsync again & it completed fine.
Running slackware current, with Kernel 3.16.4
# btrfs filesystem df /mnt/general
Data, RAID1: total=1.38TiB, used=1.38TiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=256.00KiB
Metadata, RAID1: total=6.00GiB, used=4.67GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
# btrfs filesystem show /mnt/general
Label: none uuid: 592376ea-769f-4abb-915e-aa5e49162d90
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 1.38TiB
devid 1 size 1.79TiB used 1.39TiB path /dev/sda4
devid 2 size 1.79TiB used 1.39TiB path /dev/sdd4
Btrfs v3.17.2
--
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 11:46 btrfs stuck with lot's of files Peter Volkov
2014-12-01 18:47 ` Robert White
2014-12-02 1:50 ` Peter Volkov
2014-12-02 12:48 ` Duncan
2014-12-02 18:56 ` Ian Armstrong [this message]
2014-12-02 22:42 ` Duncan
2014-12-02 1:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-02 2:00 ` Peter Volkov
2014-12-04 22:58 ` Reiterate: " Peter Volkov
2014-12-04 23:55 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141202185613.72992959@spike.private.network \
--to=btrfs@iarmst.co.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox