From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?7ZmN7IugIHNoaW4gaG9uZw==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't exist from cleaner_kthread and transaction_kthread until kthread_should_stop is true Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:11:51 +0900 Message-ID: <2014bcab0909031711k64c0ff21jaffb15c4a405c6a5@mail.gmail.com> References: <2014bcab0909030312i73f6cccfib1e612da0501cfc6@mail.gmail.com> <2014bcab0909031706y5d3397f9nd14fc1000c8b8aaf@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2014bcab0909031706y5d3397f9nd14fc1000c8b8aaf@mail.gmail.com> List-ID: However, it seems that the kthread_stop() patch is not yet applied. Linux 2.6.30.5 still use the order one. On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, =ED=99=8D=EC=8B=A0 shin hong wrote: > However, Vitaily Gusev notice me that kthread_stop() has been changed > recently so that it may executed for threads which was existed. > (commit =C2=A063706172f332fd3f6e7458ebfb35fa6de9c21dc5 > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0kthreads: rework kthr= ead_stop()) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html