From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: block: add a bi_error field to struct bio
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:31:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150604153106.GA31567@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433338959-24808-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 03 2015 at 9:42P -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> Currently we have two different ways to signal an I/O error on a BIO:
>
> (1) by clearing the BIO_UPTODATE flag
> (2) by returning a Linux errno value to the bi_end_io callback
>
> The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single possible
> error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of not beeing persistent
> when bios are queued up, and are not passed along from child to parent
> bio in the ever more popular chaining scenario. Having both mechanisms
> available has the additional drawback of utterly confusing driver authors
> and introducing bugs where various I/O submitters only deal with one of
> them, and the others have to add boilerplate code to deal with both kinds
> of error returns.
>
> So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly in struct
> bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all this up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This patch _really_ concerns me because just in DM alone I found you
took liberties that you shouldn't have and created a regression. First
issue is a real bug (your proposed dm-io.c:dmio_complete change missed
that dm-io uses error_bits and not traditional error code like expected)
the other issue being you added extra branching that isn't needed and
made review more tedious (dm.c:clone_endio).
I'll defer to others to check their respective areas of expertise but my
experience with this review should really underscore the need for more
eyes on this patch. That said, I do appreciate your effort on cleaning
this up!
For DM, please add Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> once
you've folded in this patch, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index 86dbbc7..d2fc49f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -545,7 +545,8 @@ static void dmio_complete(unsigned long error, void *context)
{
struct dm_buffer *b = context;
- b->bio.bi_end_io(&b->bio, error ? -EIO : 0);
+ b->bio.bi_error = error ? -EIO : 0;
+ b->bio.bi_end_io(&b->bio);
}
static void use_dmio(struct dm_buffer *b, int rw, sector_t block,
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 767bce9..85a7c3d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -954,25 +954,22 @@ static void disable_write_same(struct mapped_device *md)
limits->max_write_same_sectors = 0;
}
-static void clone_endio(struct bio *bio, int error)
+static void clone_endio(struct bio *bio)
{
- int r = error;
+ int r = bio->bi_error;
struct dm_target_io *tio = container_of(bio, struct dm_target_io, clone);
struct dm_io *io = tio->io;
struct mapped_device *md = tio->io->md;
dm_endio_fn endio = tio->ti->type->end_io;
- if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE) && !error)
- error = -EIO;
-
if (endio) {
- r = endio(tio->ti, bio, error);
+ r = endio(tio->ti, bio, bio->bi_error);
if (r < 0 || r == DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE)
/*
* error and requeue request are handled
* in dec_pending().
*/
- error = r;
+ ;
else if (r == DM_ENDIO_INCOMPLETE)
/* The target will handle the io */
return;
@@ -987,7 +984,7 @@ static void clone_endio(struct bio *bio, int error)
disable_write_same(md);
free_tio(md, tio);
- dec_pending(io, error);
+ dec_pending(io, r);
}
static struct dm_rq_target_io *tio_from_request(struct request *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 13:42 [RFC] add a bi_error field Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <1433338959-24808-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
2015-06-04 9:53 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] block: add a bi_error field to struct bio Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-04 15:31 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-06-10 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 15:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-10 16:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-10 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 16:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-10 18:29 ` anup modak
2015-06-11 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-11 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 2:50 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] " Neil Brown
2015-06-10 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-11 7:59 ` [RFC] add a bi_error field Liu Bo
2015-06-11 8:05 ` Liu Bo
2015-06-11 8:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-11 9:42 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150604153106.GA31567@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).