From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix defrag to merge tail file extent
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:50:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150807085045.GB8887@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438937321-19042-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Writing a xfstests case for this, will come soon.
Thanks,
-liubo
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 04:48:41PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> The file layout is
>
> [extent 1]...[extent n][4k extent][HOLE][extent x]
>
> extent 1~n and 4k extent can be merged during defrag, and the whole
> defrag bytes is larger than our defrag thresh(256k), 4k extent as a
> tail is left unmerged since we check if its next extent can be merged
> (the next one is a hole, so the check will fail), the layout thus can
> be
>
> [new extent][4k extent][HOLE][extent x]
> (1~n)
>
> To fix it, beside looking at the next one, this also looks at the
> previous one by checking @defrag_end, which is set to 0 when we
> decide to stop merging contiguous extents, otherwise, we can merge
> the previous one with our extent.
>
> Also, this makes btrfs behave consistent with how xfs and ext4 do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 0770c91..0691b2b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,7 @@ static int should_defrag_range(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u32 thresh,
> struct extent_map *em;
> int ret = 1;
> bool next_mergeable = true;
> + bool prev_mergeable = true;
>
> /*
> * make sure that once we start defragging an extent, we keep on
> @@ -1050,13 +1051,16 @@ static int should_defrag_range(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u32 thresh,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (!*defrag_end)
> + prev_mergeable = false;
> +
> next_mergeable = defrag_check_next_extent(inode, em);
> /*
> * we hit a real extent, if it is big or the next extent is not a
> * real extent, don't bother defragging it
> */
> if (!compress && (*last_len == 0 || *last_len >= thresh) &&
> - (em->len >= thresh || !next_mergeable))
> + (em->len >= thresh || (!next_mergeable && !prev_mergeable)))
> ret = 0;
> out:
> /*
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-07 8:48 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix defrag to merge tail file extent Liu Bo
2015-08-07 8:50 ` Liu Bo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150807085045.GB8887@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox