From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:11865 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932670AbbHKCdK (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:33:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:32:01 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Liu Bo Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: btrfs regression test for defrag tail extents Message-ID: <20150811023201.GL3902@dastard> References: <1439194379-29290-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1439194379-29290-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:12:59PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > Regression test for btrfs defragment tool, it's aimed to verify > that tail extents won't be skipped as a separate extent while the previous > extents have been defrag'ed into a whole extent. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo I don't see anything btrfs specific in this test, so it belongs in tests/generic/ Also, how is this different to generic/018 testing fragmented files defrag back to one extent? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com