From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.belwue.de ([129.143.2.15]:43385 "EHLO smtp2.belwue.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022AbbHMML4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:11:56 -0400 Received: from fex.belwue.de (fex.belwue.de [129.143.4.198]) by smtp2.belwue.de with ESMTP id t7DCBtEO003634 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:11:55 +0200 (MEST) env-from (framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de) Received: from fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.1.129]) by fex.belwue.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 35EFD2036A for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:11:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:11:55 +0200 From: Ulli Horlacher To: Btrfs BTRFS Subject: Re: RAID0 wrong (raw) device? Message-ID: <20150813121155.GC24122@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> References: <20150812130758.GA26529@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed 2015-08-12 (11:03), Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Ulli Horlacher > wrote: > > > /dev/sdb and /dev/sde are in reality the same physical disk! > > When does all of this confusion happen? Is it already confused before > mkfs or only after mkfs or only after mount? I have not looked closely before the mkfs.btrfs, because I noticed no problems. > I would find out what instigates it, wipe all signatures from everything, > reboot, start from scratch This is not an option for me, because this server (despite its name) is a production system. -- Ullrich Horlacher Server und Virtualisierung Rechenzentrum IZUS/TIK E-Mail: horlacher@tik.uni-stuttgart.de Universitaet Stuttgart Tel: ++49-711-68565868 Allmandring 30a Fax: ++49-711-682357 70550 Stuttgart (Germany) WWW: http://www.tik.uni-stuttgart.de/ REF: