From: Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deleted files cause btrfs-send to fail
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 23:37:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150814233737.5403f9fe@thetick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813105458.676c884a@thetick>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3571 bytes --]
Am Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:54:58 +0200
schrieb Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de>:
> Am Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:29:19 +0000 (UTC)
> schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>:
>
> > Marc Joliet posted on Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:05:41 +0200 as excerpted:
> >
> > > Here's the actual output now, obtained via btrfs-progs 4.0.1 from an
> > > initramfs emergency shell:
> > >
> > > checking extents checking free space cache checking fs roots root 5
> > > inode 8338813 errors 2000, link count wrong
> > > unresolved ref dir 26699 index 50500 namelen 4 name root
> > > filetype 0 errors 3, no dir item, no dir index
> > > root 5 inode 8338814 errors 2000, link count wrong
> > > unresolved ref dir 26699 index 50502 namelen 6 name marcec
> > > filetype 0 errors 3, no dir item, no dir index
> > > root 5 inode 8338815 errors 2000, link count wrong
> > > unresolved ref dir 26699 index 50504 namelen 6 name systab
> > > filetype 0 errors 3, no dir item, no dir index
> > > root 5 inode 8710030 errors 2000, link count wrong
> > > unresolved ref dir 26699 index 59588 namelen 6 name marcec
> > > filetype 0 errors 3, no dir item, no dir index
> > > root 5 inode 8710031 errors 2000, link count wrong
> > > unresolved ref dir 26699 index 59590 namelen 4 name root
> > > filetype 0 errors 3, no dir item, no dir index
> > > Checking filesystem on /dev/sda1 UUID:
> > > 0267d8b3-a074-460a-832d-5d5fd36bae64 found 63467610172 bytes used err is
> > > 1 total csum bytes: 59475016 total tree bytes: 1903411200 total fs tree
> > > bytes: 1691504640 total extent tree bytes: 130322432 btree space waste
> > > bytes: 442495212 file data blocks allocated: 555097092096
> > > referenced 72887840768
> > > btrfs-progs v4.0.1
> > >
> > > Again: is this fixable?
> >
> > FWIW, root 5 (which you asked about upthread) is the main filesystem
> > root. So all these appear to be on the main filesystem, not on snapshots/
> > subvolumes.
>
[...]
> > But if it's critical, you may wish to wait and have someone else confirm
> > that before acting on it, just in case I have it wrong.
>
> I can wait until tonight, at least. The FS still mounts, and it's just the root
> subvolume that's affected; running btrfs-send on the /home subvolume still
> works.
Well, I got impatient, and just went ahead and did it (I have backups, after
all). It looks like it worked: the affected files were moved to /lost+found/,
where I deleted them again, and btrfs-send works again. The output of "btrfs
check" after --repair:
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
checking csums
There are no extents for csum range 0-69632
Csum exists for 0-69632 but there is no extent record
Checking filesystem on /dev/sda1
UUID: 0267d8b3-a074-460a-832d-5d5fd36bae64
block group 274307481600 has wrong amount of free spacefailed to load free space cache for block group 274307481600
found 60980420666 bytes used err is 1
total csum bytes: 57521732
total tree bytes: 1996800000
total fs tree bytes: 1791721472
total extent tree bytes: 127942656
btree space waste bytes: 460072661
file data blocks allocated: 478650343424
referenced 73326161920
btrfs-progs v4.1.2
If I notice anything amiss, I'll report back.
(One other thing I found interesting was that "btrfs scrub" didn't care about
the link count errors.)
Greetings.
--
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
[-- Attachment #2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 22:34 Deleted files cause btrfs-send to fail Marc Joliet
2015-08-13 7:05 ` Marc Joliet
2015-08-13 8:29 ` Duncan
2015-08-13 8:54 ` Marc Joliet
2015-08-14 21:37 ` Marc Joliet [this message]
2015-08-15 5:10 ` Duncan
2015-08-15 9:19 ` Marc Joliet
2015-08-23 13:22 ` [SOLVED] " Marc Joliet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150814233737.5403f9fe@thetick \
--to=marcec@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).