From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
dsterba@suse.com, clm@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8113! (4.1.3 kernel)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:28:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825052820.GC20179@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DBD814.4000801@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:51:00AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Patches sent and CCed to you.
>
> Please try the two patches and see what's new.
> This time, I think the output will be much larger.
Indeed.
However the bad news is that gen 39538 is the highest.
Should I force btrfsck to work with an older generation, or do we throw the towel and stop bothering
trying to rescue this FS longer (it's a backup FS, so I have no data I need to recover on it, I just curious
on how it managed to corrupt itself when all I did was a weekly backup to it via btrfs send/receive.
myth:~# sort -rn -k +4 /var/spool/out |head -20
Well block 29523968(gen: 39538 level: 1) seems good, and it matches superblock
Well block 29687808(gen: 39537 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 93749248(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 60669952(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 30474240(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 29540352(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 150880256(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 150568960(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 150552576(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 150519808(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 150503424(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 141410304(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 136347648(gen: 39536 level: 0) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7312195813376(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7312194404352(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7312086122496(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7312079536128(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7311940960256(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7311866003456(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Well block 7311839477760(gen: 39535 level: 1) seems good, but generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 39538 level: 1
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 21:21 btrfs check --repair crash, and btrfs-cleaner crash Marc MERLIN
2015-07-10 13:43 ` Btrfs progs release 4.1.1 David Sterba
2015-07-12 1:02 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-07-23 11:55 ` David Sterba
2015-07-24 16:24 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-03 3:51 ` kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8113! (4.1.3 kernel) Marc MERLIN
2015-08-11 5:07 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-11 15:40 ` Josef Bacik
2015-08-12 14:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-12 15:15 ` Josef Bacik
2015-08-12 16:09 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-12 16:18 ` Josef Bacik
2015-08-12 17:19 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-17 2:01 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-17 14:49 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-22 14:37 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-24 1:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-24 4:28 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-24 5:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-24 14:10 ` Marc MERLIN
2015-08-25 0:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-25 2:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-25 5:28 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2015-08-25 6:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-25 6:50 ` Marc MERLIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825052820.GC20179@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).