From: MASAKI Yuhsuke <yek@reasonset.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs send/receive freezes a system
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:19:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150901171938.e45888976b68594cd285d526@reasonset.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DDB9D5.5070001@gmail.com>
Hi Austin, Thank you for your reply.
You wrote:
> On 2015-08-26 08:04, MASAKI Yuhsuke wrote:
> > Hi Duncan, thank you for your reply.
> >
> > I understood it is guessed from development between 3.10 and 4.1.
> >
> > I will try to replace CentOS 7 Receiver with Manjaro (same as sender) and sync.
> > I will report the result here anyway.
> > If it doesn't work, I report it Kernel BTS.
> >
> >
> > I searched distro for server use with later kernel.
> > But I couldn't find.
> > I wonder Arch Linux is better if I desire btrfs stability.
> If you want the latest kernel and userspace, then Arch is definitely one
> of the two best options, the other being Gentoo. For someone who is
> used to Manjaro or CentOS, Arch will be a lot easier to adapt to than
> Gentoo however. Both Gentoo and Arch work very well for server systems,
> and make it a lot easier to keep up to date on security patches and
> bugfixes than most of the other popular distributions.
I need complex storage (encrypt, network storage devices, bonding storages and btrfs,)
so I expect newer kernel solves some problem.
I hesitated because some prople say server os should use matured technology.
But I was certain of Arch Linux is best for my case.
> > After on previous post, it completed on 8th try with nc and piped btrfs receive.
> > But the unstability make me nervous.
> > I hope that latest kernel makes good.
> I actually just recently tested send/recieve over the network myself
> using ssh (along the lines of 'btrfs send snapshot | ssh user@remotehost
> btrfs recieve /target'), and only about 1 out of 3 attempts actually
> worked. At the time, I was on kernel 4.0. I'm thinking that something
> about recieve is timing dependent, as I got lower success rates as I
> artificially increased the network latency.
Finally, the problem is reappeared between kernel 4.2rc8 at transfared 2.79 TiB.
They are connected with generic GbE. 2.79TiB transfarred In approximately sixteen hours.
Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 17:11 btrfs send/receive freezes a system MASAKI Yuhsuke
2015-08-21 9:54 ` Duncan
2015-08-26 12:04 ` MASAKI Yuhsuke
2015-08-26 13:06 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-01 8:19 ` MASAKI Yuhsuke [this message]
2015-09-01 10:42 ` MASAKI Yuhsuke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150901171938.e45888976b68594cd285d526@reasonset.net \
--to=yek@reasonset.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).