Re: FYIO: A rant about btrfs

[Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1125 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:21:26PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-09-16 12:45, Martin Tippmann wrote:
> >2015-09-16 17:20 GMT+02:00 Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>:
> >[...]
[...]
> > From reading the list I understand that btrfs is still very much work
> >in progress and performance is not a top priority at this stage but I
> >don't see why it shouldn't perform at least equally good as ZFS/F2FS
> >on the same workloads. Is looking at performance problems on the
> >development roadmap?
> Performance is on the roadmap, but the roadmap is notoriously
> short-sighted when it comes to time-frame for completion of
> something. You have to understand also that the focus in BTRFS has
> also been more on data safety than performance, because that's the
> intended niche, and the area most people look to ZFS for.

   Wait... there's a roadmap? ;)

   Hugo.

-- 
Hugo Mills             | Our so-called leaders speak
hugo@... carfax.org.uk | with words they try to jail ya
http://carfax.org.uk/  | They subjugate the meek
PGP: E2AB1DE4          | but it's the rhetoric of failure.          The Police

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]