From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from frost.carfax.org.uk ([85.119.82.111]:48594 "EHLO frost.carfax.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752696AbbIPXbP (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:31:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:31:14 +0000 From: Hugo Mills To: Austin S Hemmelgarn Cc: Martin Tippmann , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FYIO: A rant about btrfs Message-ID: <20150916233114.GE28645@carfax.org.uk> References: <20150916144355.GA1285@invalid> <55F988A6.8070109@gmail.com> <55F9C136.3080800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+JUInw4efm7IfTNU" In-Reply-To: <55F9C136.3080800@gmail.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --+JUInw4efm7IfTNU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:21:26PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2015-09-16 12:45, Martin Tippmann wrote: > >2015-09-16 17:20 GMT+02:00 Austin S Hemmelgarn : > >[...] [...] > > From reading the list I understand that btrfs is still very much work > >in progress and performance is not a top priority at this stage but I > >don't see why it shouldn't perform at least equally good as ZFS/F2FS > >on the same workloads. Is looking at performance problems on the > >development roadmap? > Performance is on the roadmap, but the roadmap is notoriously > short-sighted when it comes to time-frame for completion of > something. You have to understand also that the focus in BTRFS has > also been more on data safety than performance, because that's the > intended niche, and the area most people look to ZFS for. Wait... there's a roadmap? ;) Hugo. -- Hugo Mills | Our so-called leaders speak hugo@... carfax.org.uk | with words they try to jail ya http://carfax.org.uk/ | They subjugate the meek PGP: E2AB1DE4 | but it's the rhetoric of failure. The Police --+JUInw4efm7IfTNU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJV+fvCAAoJEFheFHXiqx3kjxgQAIsKha+1JuLZGycdRetcDLAY H0lGJ14fUAlVOAmi8wJK0RkcLDPk15m+qAJnYYPPtIb0d1gSKFyQMqr6ZQIJltkW ALTZrYMoVQMRvFhWHqy3n3agOn9ZdFFpb42wWAkw8V9sbz6FD6AXCuAsIWtcLuWT +N5MOKPs2WltdEjdrGVnjg3Nkfa8IXndFsqUzxZiXet28HXGCw5Ns7wS3RIP2u7o +aIZZfRUGOJfb0V4h0lbMe2drXzi4bIS1o+EWQ1hl6S5GseRSQ77akLe/lrpvCM7 BeOxxOaa2XPJq5Ljg1RzfWqK/hQook35vEFg8ArKR6PWMjoJG4K8G1D/EutrYUoa HLPxBZwITd9n7Vnxfvvvzr7/2I39dGBENi9qr0SwghdInJkiBDa1kmMwprCHUrtY QZilOqFX82WETfi4+BZVhOh+NQUJqTBM0cogznW9hkkCchzHEH5DeK+06I5CmINv kBdwFvAc54VUsCTzxuSN9fgIHNir5fUl/SqOAVTfP6btlCBI6RvocgawHxZjzZBX L3LWDC4VfFHq/yMJdn3DqDXUEnShJcU5OtRWksbnAdSna0AAuxT7ajOwQ+FmruFg A7s5yWDdAJOOCj/Xu6jez+BfXxsjcRzbJRq8AK6V4t6/iNgzcqxpu449y7EtjOEQ PuGrX9zk5agrJTrr6+Zc =QavQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+JUInw4efm7IfTNU--