From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
To: dsterba@suse.cz,
"Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix no space bug caused by removing bg
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:36:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922143602.GI5918@carfax.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150922142333.GH12815@twin.jikos.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2237 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:23:33PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:41:31PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:36:43PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > > On 09/22/15 14:59, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> > > (snip)
> > > > So if they way we want to prevent the loss of raid type info is by
> > > > maintaining the last block group allocated with that raid type, fine,
> > > > but that's a separate discussion. Personally, I think keeping 1GB
> > >
> > > At this point I'm much more surprised to learn that the RAID type can
> > > apparently get "lost" in the first place, and is not persisted
> > > separately. I mean..wat?
> >
> > It's always been like that, unfortunately.
> >
> > The code tries to use the RAID type that's already present to work
> > out what the next allocation should be. If there aren't any chunks in
> > the FS, the configuration is lost, because it's not stored anywhere
> > else. It's one of the things that tripped me up badly when I was
> > failing to rewrite the chunk allocator last year.
>
> Yeah, right now there's no persistent default for the allocator. I'm
> still hoping that the object properties will magically solve that.
There's no obvious place that filesystem-wide properties can be
stored, though. There's a userspace tool to manipulate the few current
FS-wide properties, but that's all special-cased to use the
"historical" ioctls for those properties, with no generalisation of a
property store, or even (IIRC) any external API for them.
We're nominally using xattrs in the btrfs: namespace on directories
and files, and presumably on the top directory of a subvolume for
subvol-wide properties, but it's not clear where the FS-wide values
should go: in the top directory of subvolid=5 would be confusing,
because then you couldn't separate the properties for *that subvol*
from the ones for the whole FS (say, the default replication policy,
where you might want the top subvol to have different properties from
everything else).
Hugo.
--
Hugo Mills | Putting U back in Honor, Valor, and Trth.
hugo@... carfax.org.uk |
http://carfax.org.uk/ |
PGP: E2AB1DE4 |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 12:59 [PATCH] btrfs: Fix no space bug caused by removing bg Zhao Lei
2015-09-21 13:27 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-09-21 13:37 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-09-22 10:06 ` Zhao Lei
2015-09-22 10:22 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-09-22 11:24 ` Zhao Lei
2015-09-22 12:45 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-09-23 1:59 ` Zhao Lei
2015-09-22 10:22 ` Zhao Lei
2015-09-22 12:59 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-09-22 13:28 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-22 13:36 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-09-22 13:41 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-22 14:23 ` David Sterba
2015-09-22 14:36 ` Hugo Mills [this message]
2015-09-22 14:54 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-22 15:39 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-22 17:32 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-22 17:37 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-23 4:49 ` Duncan
2015-09-23 13:28 ` David Sterba
2015-09-23 13:57 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-23 14:05 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-23 13:12 ` David Sterba
2015-09-23 13:19 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-23 13:32 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-23 14:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-23 17:28 ` David Sterba
2015-09-23 13:37 ` David Sterba
2015-09-23 13:45 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-23 13:28 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-22 16:23 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-09-23 2:14 ` Zhao Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150922143602.GI5918@carfax.org.uk \
--to=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).