From: "S. Fricke" <silvio.fricke@gmail.com>
To: Richard Michael <rmichael@edgeofthenet.org>
Cc: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>,
"Linux Btrfs" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: problem with long running btrfs mount operation
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:43:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922144312.GB14395@sfserver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABR0jERXQ9ydE+KAeQBrW5F0DzraePnAyz8m-uVStUCbeFt4WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Holger Hoffstätte
> <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On 09/22/15 15:38, S. Fricke wrote:
> >> I have a problem with one of my btrfs hdds. If I mount it, it needs more than
> >> 135 minutes for this operation. After the mounting it works normaly. This is
> >> reproducible only with this hdd.
> >>
> >> Maybe someone has a clue what is going wrong here.
> >
> > On remount it tries to continue a previously started balance, which fails with
> > an error (as can be seen at the end of your log). You should:
> >
> > a) immediately stop what you're doing on that fs and unmount it
> > b) get btrfs-progs-4.2.1 (not 4.2) and see what it says
What should it say to me? I have to send a command? Should I try to mount the
device after I have unmount it? BTW: Is btrfs-progs needed for mounting?
> >
> > Depending on the outcome of b) you can use -o skip_balance on the next mount.
> >
> > -h
>
> I'm curious, do the relevant INFO lines also appear earlier in the
> log, near the time the mount began?
>
> These:
>
> BTRFS: checking UUID tree
> [ +0.000076] BTRFS info (device sda1): continuing balance
>
>
> Otherwise, it requires an unknown amount of patience to diagnose this
> problem -- how long should I wait before giving up?
>
> It seems to me, from a sysadmin's perspective, the log messages are
> reversed (hung task, 2+ hrs later, BTRFS tells me what it's doing) .
> I'd expect BTRFS to log a "continuing balance" message as soon as I
> mount it, then it's blocked [for as long as I care to wait], but I can
> immediately tell what's happened.
Thats my problem in general with btrfs, and other filesystems, I have a
glitch; I have to wait, but I have no possibilities to look what is going on
on drive X. Okay I could use sysemtaps, has someone good scripts for such
usecase? Or maybe we have other toolings?
Regards,
Silvio
--
-- S. Fricke ---------------------------------------- silvio@port1024.net --
Diplom-Informatiker (FH)
Linux-Entwicklung JABBER: silvio@conversation.port1024.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 13:38 problem with long running btrfs mount operation S. Fricke
2015-09-22 13:53 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-09-22 14:31 ` Richard Michael
2015-09-22 14:43 ` S. Fricke [this message]
2015-09-22 14:57 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-09-22 15:13 ` Hugo Mills
2015-09-23 5:42 ` S. Fricke
2015-09-23 9:36 ` Holger Hoffstätte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150922144312.GB14395@sfserver \
--to=silvio.fricke@gmail.com \
--cc=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmichael@edgeofthenet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).