linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Walberg <twalberg@comcast.net>
To: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Expected behavior of bad sectors on one drive in a RAID1
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:54:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020205438.GC4598@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56269D1C.5080006@gmail.com>

On 10/20/2015 15:59 -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>      .........
>>	With a 32-bit checksum and a 4k block (the math is easier with
>>	smaller numbers), that's 4128 bits, which means that a random
>>	single bit error will have a approximately 0.24% chance of
>>	occurring in a given bit, which translates to an approximately
>>	7.75% chance that it will occur in one of the checksum bits.  For a
>>	16k block it's smaller of course (around 1.8% I think, but that's
>>	just a guess), but it's still sufficiently statistically likely
>>	that it should be considered.
>>      .........



Last I checked, a 4 kilo-BYTE block consisted of 32768 BITs... So the
percentages should in fact be considerably smaller than that.


-- 
twalberg@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-20 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-20  4:16 Expected behavior of bad sectors on one drive in a RAID1 james harvey
2015-10-20  4:45 ` Russell Coker
2015-10-20 13:00   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-20 13:15     ` Russell Coker
2015-10-20 13:59       ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-20 19:20         ` Duncan
2015-10-20 19:59           ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-20 20:54             ` Tim Walberg [this message]
2015-10-21 11:51             ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-21 12:07               ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-21 16:01                 ` Chris Murphy
2015-10-21 17:28                   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-20 18:54 ` Duncan
2015-10-20 19:48   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-20 21:24     ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151020205438.GC4598@comcast.net \
    --to=twalberg@comcast.net \
    --cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).