From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:18084 "EHLO ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752209AbcBIHvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:51:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:43:30 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/23] xfs/122: support refcount/rmap data structures Message-ID: <20160209074330.GK19486@dastard> References: <20160209011145.23099.95354.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160209011303.23099.40721.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160209011303.23099.40721.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:13:03PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Include the refcount and rmap structures in the golden output. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > --- > tests/xfs/122 | 3 +++ > tests/xfs/122.out | 4 ++++ > tests/xfs/group | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/122 b/tests/xfs/122 > index e6697a2..758cb50 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/122 > +++ b/tests/xfs/122 > @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ xfs_da3_icnode_hdr > xfs_dir3_icfree_hdr > xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr > xfs_name > +xfs_owner_info > +xfs_refcount_irec > +xfs_rmap_irec > xfs_alloctype_t > xfs_buf_cancel_t > xfs_bmbt_rec_32_t So this is going to cause failures on any userspace that doesn't know about these new types, right? Should these be conditional in some way? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com