From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/23] xfs: aio cow tests
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:51:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209215149.GD6350@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160209083215.GP19486@dastard>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:32:15PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:14:01PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> .,,,
> > +
> > +echo "Check for damage"
> > +_dmerror_unmount
> > +_dmerror_cleanup
> > +_repair_scratch_fs >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1
>
> Are you testing repair here? If so, why doesn't failure matter.
> If not, why do it? Or is _require_scratch_nocheck all that is needed
> here?
Uggghhh.... so xfs_repair dumps its regular output to stderr, so the "2>&1"
pushes the output to $seqres.full.
The return codes from xfs_repair seem to be:
0: fs is ok now
1: fs is probably broken
2: log needs to be replayed
The return codes from fsck seem to be:
0: no errors found
1: errors fixed
2: errors fixed, reboot required
(etc)
So I guess the way out is to provide a better wrapper to the repair tools
so that _repair_scratch_fs always returns 0 for "fs should be ok now" and
nonzero otherwise:
_repair_scratch_fs()
{
case $FSTYP in
xfs)
_scratch_xfs_repair "$@" 2>&1
res=$?
if [ "$res" -eq 2 ]; then
echo "xfs_repair returns $res; replay log?"
_scratch_mount
res=$?
if [ "$res" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "mount returns $res; zap log?"
_scratch_xfs_repair -L 2>&1
echo "log zap returns $?"
else
umount "$SCRATCH_MNT"
fi
_scratch_xfs_repair "$@" 2>&1
res=$?
fi
test $res -ne 0 && >&2 echo "xfs_repair failed, err=$res"
return $res
;;
*)
# Let's hope fsck -y suffices...
fsck -t $FSTYP -y $SCRATCH_DEV 2>&1
res=$?
case $res in
0|1|2)
res=0
;;
*)
>&2 echo "fsck.$FSTYP failed, err=$res"
;;
esac
return $res
;;
esac
}
> > +echo "CoW and unmount"
> > +"$XFS_IO_PROG" -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 $((blksz * bsz)) 1" "$testdir/file2" >> "$seqres.full"
> > +"$XFS_IO_PROG" -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b $((blksz * bsz)) 0 $((blksz * nr))" "$TEST_DIR/moo" >> "$seqres.full"
>
> offset = block size times block size?
>
> I think some better names might be needed...
Yes. Is now "bufnr" and bufsize=$((blksz * bufnr)).
--D
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-09 1:11 [PATCH v4.1 00/23] xfstests: test the nfs/cifs/btrfs/xfs reflink/dedupe ioctls Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:11 ` [PATCH 01/23] generic/182: this is a dedupe test, check for dedupe Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:11 ` [PATCH 02/23] xfstests: filter whitespace in 128 and 132 Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 03/23] xfstests: make _scratch_mkfs_blocksized usable Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 04/23] reflink: remove redundant filesystem checks from the end of the tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 05/23] common/dmerror: add some more dmerror routines Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 06/23] dio unwritten conversion bug tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 7:37 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 8:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 07/23] reflink: test intersecting CoW and falloc/fpunch/fzero/fcollapse/finsert/ftrunc Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 08/23] reflink: test CoW behavior with IO errors Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 09/23] reflink: test CoW operations against the source file Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 10/23] xfs: more reflink tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 7:36 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 8:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:12 ` [PATCH 11/23] reflink: ensure that we can handle reflinking a lot of extents Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 12/23] xfs/122: support refcount/rmap data structures Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 7:43 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 7:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 8:53 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 13/23] xfs: test fragmentation characteristics of copy-on-write Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 8:01 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-10 1:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 14/23] reflink: high offset reflink and dedupe tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 15/23] reflink: test xfs cow behavior when the filesystem crashes Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 16/23] reflink: test quota accounting Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 17/23] reflink: test CoW across a mixed range of block types with cowextsize set Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 8:09 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-10 1:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 18/23] xfs: test the automatic cowextsize extent garbage collector Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 8:15 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-10 1:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 19/23] xfs: test rmapbt functionality Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 8:26 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-10 1:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:13 ` [PATCH 20/23] reflink: test aio copy on write Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:14 ` [PATCH 21/23] xfs: aio cow tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 8:32 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 21:51 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2016-02-09 1:14 ` [PATCH 22/23] xfs: test xfs_getbmapx behavior with shared extents Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 1:14 ` [PATCH 23/23] reflink: test reflink+cow+enospc all at the same time Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 7:21 ` [PATCH v4.1 00/23] xfstests: test the nfs/cifs/btrfs/xfs reflink/dedupe ioctls Dave Chinner
2016-02-09 7:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-02-09 7:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160209215149.GD6350@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).