[PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Philippe Loctaux]

Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Loctaux <phil@philippeloctaux.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 769e0ff..c9fd42d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static int tree_mod_log_free_eb(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 struct btrfs_path *btrfs_alloc_path(void)
 {
 	struct btrfs_path *path;
+
 	path = kmem_cache_zalloc(btrfs_path_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
 	return path;
 }
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct btrfs_path *btrfs_alloc_path(void)
 noinline void btrfs_set_path_blocking(struct btrfs_path *p)
 {
 	int i;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL; i++) {
 		if (!p->nodes[i] || !p->locks[i])
 			continue;
@@ -873,6 +875,7 @@ tree_mod_log_eb_move(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *dst,
 		     int dst_offset, int src_offset, int nr_items)
 {
 	int ret;
+
 	ret = tree_mod_log_insert_move(fs_info, dst, dst_offset, src_offset,
 				       nr_items, GFP_NOFS);
 	BUG_ON(ret < 0);
@@ -943,6 +946,7 @@ tree_mod_log_set_root_pointer(struct btrfs_root *root,
 			      int log_removal)
 {
 	int ret;
+
 	ret = tree_mod_log_insert_root(root->fs_info, root->node,
 				       new_root_node, GFP_NOFS, log_removal);
 	BUG_ON(ret < 0);
@@ -1734,6 +1738,7 @@ static inline unsigned int leaf_data_end(struct btrfs_root *root,
 					 struct extent_buffer *leaf)
 {
 	u32 nr = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
+
 	if (nr == 0)
 		return BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root);
 	return btrfs_item_offset_nr(leaf, nr - 1);
@@ -2011,6 +2016,7 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			right = NULL;
 		} else {
 			struct btrfs_disk_key right_key;
+
 			btrfs_node_key(right, &right_key, 0);
 			tree_mod_log_set_node_key(root->fs_info, parent,
 						  pslot + 1, 0);
@@ -2056,6 +2062,7 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	} else {
 		/* update the parent key to reflect our changes */
 		struct btrfs_disk_key mid_key;
+
 		btrfs_node_key(mid, &mid_key, 0);
 		tree_mod_log_set_node_key(root->fs_info, parent,
 					  pslot, 0);
@@ -2154,6 +2161,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			ret = wret;
 		if (wret == 0) {
 			struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
+
 			orig_slot += left_nr;
 			btrfs_node_key(mid, &disk_key, 0);
 			tree_mod_log_set_node_key(root->fs_info, parent,
@@ -2382,6 +2390,7 @@ static noinline void unlock_up(struct btrfs_path *path, int level,
 		}
 		if (!no_skips && path->keep_locks) {
 			u32 nritems;
+
 			t = path->nodes[i];
 			nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(t);
 			if (nritems < 1 || path->slots[i] >= nritems - 1) {
@@ -2529,6 +2538,7 @@ setup_nodes_for_search(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		       int *write_lock_level)
 {
 	int ret;
+
 	if ((p->search_for_split || ins_len > 0) && btrfs_header_nritems(b) >=
 	    BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root) - 3) {
 		int sret;
@@ -2825,6 +2835,7 @@ cow_done:
 
 		if (level != 0) {
 			int dec = 0;
+
 			if (ret && slot > 0) {
 				dec = 1;
 				slot -= 1;
@@ -2993,6 +3004,7 @@ again:
 
 		if (level != 0) {
 			int dec = 0;
+
 			if (ret && slot > 0) {
 				dec = 1;
 				slot -= 1;
@@ -3139,6 +3151,7 @@ static void fixup_low_keys(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 
 	for (i = level; i < BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL; i++) {
 		int tslot = path->slots[i];
+
 		if (!path->nodes[i])
 			break;
 		t = path->nodes[i];
@@ -3574,6 +3587,7 @@ noinline int btrfs_leaf_free_space(struct btrfs_root *root,
 {
 	int nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
 	int ret;
+
 	ret = BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root) - leaf_space_used(leaf, 0, nritems);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		btrfs_crit(root->fs_info,
@@ -3630,6 +3644,7 @@ static noinline int __push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 				break;
 			if (path->slots[0] == i) {
 				int space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(root, left);
+
 				if (space + push_space * 2 > free_space)
 					break;
 			}
@@ -3849,6 +3864,7 @@ static noinline int __push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 				break;
 			if (path->slots[0] == i) {
 				int space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(root, right);
+
 				if (space + push_space * 2 > free_space)
 					break;
 			}
@@ -4488,6 +4504,7 @@ int btrfs_split_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		     unsigned long split_offset)
 {
 	int ret;
+
 	ret = setup_leaf_for_split(trans, root, path,
 				   sizeof(struct btrfs_item));
 	if (ret)
@@ -4578,6 +4595,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
 	/* first correct the data pointers */
 	for (i = slot; i < nritems; i++) {
 		u32 ioff;
+
 		item = btrfs_item_nr(i);
 
 		ioff = btrfs_token_item_offset(leaf, item, &token);
@@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
 			      data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end);
 	} else {
 		struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
+
 		u64 offset;
 
 		btrfs_item_key(leaf, &disk_key, slot);
@@ -4679,6 +4698,7 @@ void btrfs_extend_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
 	/* first correct the data pointers */
 	for (i = slot; i < nritems; i++) {
 		u32 ioff;
+
 		item = btrfs_item_nr(i);
 
 		ioff = btrfs_token_item_offset(leaf, item, &token);
@@ -4993,6 +5013,7 @@ int btrfs_del_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
 		}
 	} else {
 		int used = leaf_space_used(leaf, 0, nritems);
+
 		if (slot == 0) {
 			struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
 
@@ -5234,6 +5255,7 @@ static int tree_move_next_or_upnext(struct btrfs_root *root,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	int nritems;
+
 	nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[*level]);
 
 	path->slots[*level]++;
@@ -5598,6 +5620,7 @@ next:
 			int ret;
 			int orig_lowest;
 			struct btrfs_key cur_key;
+
 			if (level + 1 >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL ||
 			    !path->nodes[level + 1])
 				return 1;
-- 
2.7.1

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings.
[]
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
[]
> @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
>  			      data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end);
>  	} else {
>  		struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
> +
>  		u64 offset;

Overzealous here.
No additional blank line required.

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Philippe Loctaux]

Is there no need of additional blank line here particulary
or in all lines that I changed?

--
Philippe Loctaux
phil@philippeloctaux.com

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> > Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings.
> []
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> []
> > @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> >  			      data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end);
> >  	} else {
> >  		struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
> > +
> >  		u64 offset;
> 
> Overzealous here.
> No additional blank line required.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:01 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> Is there no need of additional blank line here particulary
> or in all lines that I changed?

Please don't top post and just here.
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> > > Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > []
> > > @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> > >  			      data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end);
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
> > > +
> > >  		u64 offset;
> > 
> > Overzealous here.
> > No additional blank line required.

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Philippe Loctaux]

Hi,
I'm really sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to mean.
Could you simplify your sentence please (since I'm not english native)?
I'd really apreciate that, thanks :)

--
Philippe Loctaux
phil@philippeloctaux.com

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:06:03PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:01 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> > Is there no need of additional blank line here particulary
> > or in all lines that I changed?
> 
> Please don't top post and just here.
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> > > > Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings.
> > > []
> > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > > []
> > > > @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> > > >  			      data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end);
> > > >  	} else {
> > > >  		struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
> > > > +
> > > >  		u64 offset;
> > > 
> > > Overzealous here.
> > > No additional blank line required.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:31 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm really sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to mean.
> Could you simplify your sentence please (since I'm not english
> native)?
> I'd really apreciate that, thanks :)

Please do not put your reply at the top of the email. (top-post)

This was the only instance I found where your modifications
were inappropriate (just here)

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Philippe Loctaux]

Oh okay, thanks :)

--
Philippe Loctaux
phil@philippeloctaux.com

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:44:14PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:31 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm really sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to mean.
> > Could you simplify your sentence please (since I'm not english
> > native)?
> > I'd really apreciate that, thanks :)
> 
> Please do not put your reply at the top of the email. (top-post)
> 
> This was the only instance I found where your modifications
> were inappropriate (just here)
> 

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

[Duncan]

Philippe Loctaux posted on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:22:10 +0100 as excerpted:

> Oh okay, thanks :)
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:44:14PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:31 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I'm really sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to mean.
>> > Could you simplify your sentence please (since I'm not english
>> > native)?
>> > I'd really apreciate that, thanks :)
>> 
>> Please do not put your reply at the top of the email. (top-post)

But... you still did it!

(OTOH, this is an example of replying in context, save for the small 
problem that the message I replied to was top-posted, making things out 
of order for readers both of this message and of further messages that 
maintain the quotes in that order.  Had you replied at the bottom, or 
interleaved in context under each point you're replying to, further 
replies and their context would have been far clearer for others reading 
and replying.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman