From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 17.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.179.142]:59800 "EHLO 17.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753558AbcBVKIY (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:08:24 -0500 Received: from mail690.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DB9EA1024009 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:42:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:42:19 +0100 From: Philippe Loctaux To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Question]: Contributing to btrfs Message-ID: <20160222074210.GA18171@carbon.ljdarc.local> References: <20160220210903.GA3182@carbon.home> <20160220224050.GA10864@carbon.home> <56CA61CC.7010703@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160222072659.GC17243@carbon.ljdarc.local> <56CABA08.2000403@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <56CABA08.2000403@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:34:32PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > It depends. > If it's just small fix, and can be applied on Chris' integration branch, > that's OK. Allright, the patches I sent added/removed a couple of lines, so it should be fine. > > But for huge modifications, it's recommended to use integration branch, as > the final pull request is sent to btrfs maintainer Chris, not Linus. For the moment I'll send small ones, I don't wanna get dirty too fast :P Thanks for your quick reply! -- Philippe Loctaux phil@philippeloctaux.com