From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 6.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.43.205]:45500 "EHLO 6.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbcBVQpZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:45:25 -0500 Received: from mail156.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 43FAE1034081 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:45:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:45:21 +0100 From: Philippe Loctaux To: Filipe Manana Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Question]: Contributing to btrfs Message-ID: <20160222164521.GC2267@carbon.home> References: <20160220210903.GA3182@carbon.home> <20160220224050.GA10864@carbon.home> <56CA61CC.7010703@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160222072659.GC17243@carbon.ljdarc.local> <1456142520.3587.3.camel@ubuntu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 01:29:31PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > Whitespace/style patches I doubt. He probably encourages for small > cleanup/optimizations as the first patch, like he did recently at > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/919. That's something that requires > some thinking and understanding. Now running checkpatch and fix its > warnings, doesn't require any skill at all. > What were you planning? Sending more 100 patches, each one to fix a > different style issue for each function? There's probably hundreds or > thousands more style/whitespace "issues" to fix in btrfs alone. I agree with you, I won't spend all my time fixing style/whitespace issues, now that I know what I can do, thanks for that :) -- Philippe Loctaux phil@philippeloctaux.com